Cancer and the New Biology of Water

Product Information

It is important for me to let you know that you're going to be leading the work in these sessions and I'll be alongside you every step of the way. I am seeing a lot of fear-mongering posts about these and would like to know what is really going on with them.

It is great way to dig into this international lie of viral theory. It really is a war game being played on us all. Papadopulos-Eleopulos, E, Turner, V & Papadimitriou, J, “Is a Positive Western Blot Proof of HIV Infection?”, Nature Biotechnology, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0693-696

The support of my friends and family allows me to carry on, but the real task is simply to help the world be a better place than when I found it. The CGTC had existed since 1928 when it was founded by Dr William Moodie and had its own proud traditions. John Bowbly had trained there and it had a key role in establishing multi-disciplinary teams for supporting children and their families. I’ve listened to Dr. Tom’s many podcasts on water, however, I don’t recall him ever talking about the alkalinity of water and its importance. Is it important? Michael Balint also began developing support groups for medical practitioners. Balint groups remain an important support and training resource for anyone working in the NHS. Working closely together, Rob Hale and Anton Obholzer began a strategy of making the two clinics more outward facing by building support at the Houses of Parliament and generally publicising the work of the two institutions.

With regards to our genetics not being stable along with the other questionable areas in the entire field could it be possible for water to be literally creating our features and individual selves just as is demonstrated with Veda Austin’s water crystallography work? Like an imprint.None of this is to say that a healthy terrain is not the most important factor, but the viral model stil seems to provide valuable predictions. Thanks for doing this podcast. I had heard bits and pieces of this elsewhere so it is good to have a more complete discussion. I think the two big problems with Dr. Cowen’s argument is that while he seems to make a good case that” viral theory” is at best incomplete ( I am not familiar with the details so I can’t really say for sure) his argument 1) is missing a meaningful “so what” and 2) viral theory seems to make many accurate predictions which we can act on even if it is incomplete. Some specifics include: https://www.globalresearch.ca/nucleic-acid-testing-technologies-use-polymerase-chain-reaction-pcr-detection-sars-cov-2/5739959?pdf=5739959