Reviewing the subject matter and peculiarities of development of Globalistics today, we can state the absence of a single conception explaining the structure, functioning and evolution of global systems, processes and problems which can serve as a firm basis for predictive assessments. We are to create it on the path of synthesis of philosophical, political, economic, ecological and other aspects of Globalistics. Globalistics is a very young academic field, that is why it has a large number of unresolved problems. It has not been fully incorporated yet into the system of academic disciplines. An attempt to contribute to the solving of this problem has been undertaken in a recently published monograph (Ilyin and Ursul 2009), where Globalistics is considered as a very important element of the system of integrative-scientific knowledge that forms the modern scientific worldview based on the principles of global evolutionism. This system of knowledge emerges in the way of interdisciplinary synthesis and integrative processes within sciences.

Globalistics is a young scientific field at its early stages of establishment as an interdisciplinary course and the issues of staffing and educational basis are of crucial importance. How should globalistic research be developed? How can the results of this research be incorporated into the teaching process so that the university graduates obtain a wide range of knowledge, world outlook and competence to analyze and solve the on-going processes and problems at the global scale? Globalistics is a cross-disciplinary integrative field of research. It aims at investigating global problems in all their facets: from causes, laws and tendencies of global processes through an insight into positive and negative effects to the survival of humankind and the protection of the biosphere (Chumakov 2008). Thus, Globalistics may be regarded as a sort of systemic and more or less integrated ‘core’ within Global Studies. Part 2 ( Globalistics, Global Studies, and Models) comprises articles that consider in detail the notion of Globalistics and possible directions of development of this field of academic research. This section also contains articles on modeling of global processes, as well as their quantitative analyses with various globalization indices. Martell, Luke (2007). "The Third Wave in Globalization Theory" (PDF). International Studies Review. 9 (2): 173–196. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2486.2007.00670.x.

Wikipedia citation

Gabdullin, R. R., Ilyin, I. V., and Ivanov, A. V. 2011 . Introduction into Paleoglobalistics. Moscow: Moscow University Press. In Russian. First of all, today it is possible to speak about three main subjects of Globalistics, namely global systems, processes and problems. They are interconnected and each concept should single out its own peculiar globality criteria. Saul, John Ralston (2009-09-22). The Collapse of Globalism Revised Edition: And The Reinvention Of The World. Penguin Canada. ISBN 978-0-14-317480-6. Mazour, I. I., and Chumakov, A. N. 2003. (Eds.). Globalistics. Encyclopedia. Moscow: Raduga. In Russian. Victor, David G. (2021-10-28). "Rebuilding US-Chinese cooperation on climate change: The science and technology opportunity". Brookings . Retrieved 2021-11-15.

Veseth, Michael, ed. (2002). The Rise of the Global Economy. The New York Times 20th Century in Review. Chicago, IL: Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers. ISBN 978-1-57958-369-9. Being one of global processes, globalization has many faces; it has its own image in every country. One can get a truly objective picture only through a synthesis of all those particular visions. Thus, there is a necessity to provide a multi-faceted analysis of globalization, to co-operate with scholars from many different countries and to integrate visions of global processes from all continents, regions and states. We believe that current events such as the financial crisis illustrate that discussion should not be limited to particular geographic regions or narrowly-defined methods of analysis. It is important to provide for a broadly international and multicultural forum on issues associated with globalization, and the influence of globalization in particular cultural-geographic regions. Today we can observe the predominance of ‘morphological’ task-solving pattern in Globalistics, whereas it is necessary to pay much more attention to historical and forecasting aspects of Global Studies.Early ideas of globalism were also expressed by Adam Smith through his views on the role of commodities in distinguishing the civilized from the barbarous, which was deeply embedded in the ideology of empires. [7] [8] [9] [10] Broad interpretation and perception of Globalistics and the criteria of globality is also necessary, which implies a universal character of global processes; space-time perception; considering the latest achievements in the studies of global natural processes. It is obvious that a ‘global-scientific’ and universal interdisciplinary approach is necessary.

Mazour, I. I., Chumakov, A. N., and Gay, W. 2006. (Eds.). Global Studies. International Encyclopedic Dictionary. Moscow; St-Peterburg; New-York: Dialog; Elima; Piter.In the present anthology one can find perceptions of globalization by a number of famous scholars from various countries of the world (Ervin Laszlo, Roland Robertson, Shmuel N. Eisenstadt, Randall Collins, Christopher Chase-Dunn, William Thompson and others), but one can also get to know rather peculiar visions of globalization by the Russian scientists and scholars. We have no doubt that in this respect the present volume could be of special interest, as Russia is a place where the Western and non-Western ideas and cultural processes have been meeting for centuries. In this respect Russia is a suitable country for the publication of a book with the aims outlined above. issues of globalization and regionalization in international collaboration and general issues of Globalistics methodology. Ilyin, I. V., and Ursul, A. D. 2009. Evolutionary Globalistics (The Conception of Evolution of Global Processes). Moscow: Moscow University Press. In Russian.

perspectives of the Common Wealth States (CIS), national interests and strategies of Russia and the CIS, centers of world power and the role of Russia in the world development; United States Department of State (1948). Foreign Relations, 1948: Volume I, Part 2. Washington, DC: US Government.A characteristic example here is provided by Geopolitics that was born with such a status that was rather close to global, and that becomes more and more global every year (see Abylgaziev, Ilyin, and Kefeli 2010).